Table of contents
Your Clubs Are Not Waiting
While your board discusses whether AI is on the strategic agenda, your clubs are already using ChatGPT to write grant applications, generate social media content, and draft policies. They are doing this without guidelines, without quality control, and without your input.
This is not a future risk. This is the current state of play.
The Three Options
Lead. Develop AI guidelines for clubs. Provide AI-generated templates for common tasks — safeguarding policies, financial reporting, event promotion. Train club committees on effective AI use. Set quality standards. This positions your body as forward-thinking and gives clubs tools they will actually use.
Follow. Wait until AI use is widespread, then create retroactive guidelines. You will always be catching up. Clubs will have developed their own practices — some good, some problematic.
Ignore. Pretend AI is not relevant to community sport. Every club develops its own approach. Inconsistency proliferates. A safeguarding policy generated by AI at one club contradicts the one at the club down the road. You have zero visibility.
Why Governing Bodies Should Lead
AI produces more content, faster. That means more noise in an environment already suffering from information overload. Governing bodies that lead can shape how AI is used — ensuring consistency, quality, and compliance across their network.
Imagine this: every club in your sport has access to an AI-generated safeguarding framework, localised to their state and their club size, consistent with your national policy. Every club produces the same quality of governance documentation. Not because you wrote 300 individual documents, but because you created one AI template that scales.
That is the opportunity.
The Risks of Not Acting
Clubs generate AI content that contradicts your policies. A safeguarding document that misses your specific requirements. A public statement that does not align with your values. An event promotion that makes claims your sport cannot back.
Without guidelines, these are not hypothetical. They are inevitable.
What a Governing Body AI Strategy Looks Like
Policy. A one-page statement on AI use for clubs. What is encouraged (content generation, admin efficiency). What requires review (policy documents, compliance materials). What is prohibited (replacing human judgment on safeguarding or legal matters).
Templates. AI-generated templates for the 20 most common club documents — policies, reports, communications. Consistent, compliant, customisable.
Training. A 30-minute webinar on "How to use AI effectively at your club." Practical, not theoretical. Delivered annually as part of committee induction.
Quality control. Spot-check AI-generated content from clubs. Not to police — to support. Identify gaps in the templates and improve them.
The Timeline
This does not require a 12-month project. A governing body can have an AI policy in a week, initial templates in a month, and a training webinar within a quarter.
The clubs that get early support will produce better content, more consistent governance, and stronger compliance. The governing body that provides that support earns trust and relevance.
The alternative is watching from the sideline while your clubs figure it out themselves.
Don't miss these
What Governing Bodies Get Wrong About Technology
Governing bodies buy technology for themselves, not for their clubs. That is the first mistake. Here are four more.
The McDonald's Model: Why Sporting Clubs Are Franchises (And Should Be Treated L
Local governments don't fund every club directly. They use volunteers. That's a franchise model. Here's what changes when you recognise it.
Run Better Committee Meetings
Running a committee is hard work. Here are simple tips and tools to ensure your team is connected, happy, and meetings run efficiently.